American Invasion of Iraq and Israeli-American Front
It is well documented that Israeli-Americans , a segment of International Lobby for the government of Israel had advocated invasion of Iraq. The same groups are using their highly placed influence on the government of the United States and along with the neoconservative fronts to attack Iran.
Israeli influence is fully integrated into the American government through its strong Lobby. Even with a majority of Democrats in both the House and Senate of the United States, the Congress still is tied to the yoke of the Lobby. At a late night session in the Senate on Friday, September 14, 2007, Senator Joe Lieberman (I-VT) submitted an amendment to provide $75 million for “democracy promotion in Iran”. The amendment, which was cosponsored by Senators Sam Brownback (R-KS), Jon Kyl (R-AZ), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Susan Collins (R-ME), Mel Martinez (R-FL), David Vitter (R-LA), passed by voice vote in Senate bill State and Foreign Operations Appropriations Act (HR 2764). The Bush administration’s original request in the Fiscal Year 2008 State and Foreign Operations Appropriations Act for $75 million, which had been cut by two-thirds to $25 million by the Senate Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs earlier this year. The Democratic Party leadership horse traded Lieberman’s vote for the Fiscal Year 2008 budget for the amendment.
Senator Lieberman, a front for the Israeli Lobby, called the program “loudly heard and appreciated within the Iranian dissident community.” The past experience of our government should have demonstrated that such interference in the affairs of another nation would create greater hostilities. One of the objectives of the Lobby has been to create greater hostility between Iran and our government. Also, it must be obvious that any Iranian accepting money from our American administration to create trouble for Iran would be considered a traitor, a spy and at least would be shunned by Iranians. Would we react differently if anyone of us would accept money from a foreign country for the purpose of creating unrest within the United States?
In the jargon of the present administration of the United States, any government friendly to Israel and subservient to our American foreign policy and providing us with cheap natural resources is a friend of the United States.
What is “democracy promotion in Iran”? One definition of democracy would be a country managed by a representative government elected under the principle of “one man one vote”. Under this definition, Iran is democratic country; the Iranian president and the representative of government are elected by the Iranian people. During the last elections more of the eligible Iranians voted than in our own elections. Why are we so concern about Iran? We have too many problems at home to deal with, including education, healthcare and deteriorating infrastructures.
Israeli influence is fully integrated into the American government through its strong Lobby. Even with a majority of Democrats in both the House and Senate of the United States, the Congress still is tied to the yoke of the Lobby. At a late night session in the Senate on Friday, September 14, 2007, Senator Joe Lieberman (I-VT) submitted an amendment to provide $75 million for “democracy promotion in Iran”. The amendment, which was cosponsored by Senators Sam Brownback (R-KS), Jon Kyl (R-AZ), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Susan Collins (R-ME), Mel Martinez (R-FL), David Vitter (R-LA), passed by voice vote in Senate bill State and Foreign Operations Appropriations Act (HR 2764). The Bush administration’s original request in the Fiscal Year 2008 State and Foreign Operations Appropriations Act for $75 million, which had been cut by two-thirds to $25 million by the Senate Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs earlier this year. The Democratic Party leadership horse traded Lieberman’s vote for the Fiscal Year 2008 budget for the amendment.
Senator Lieberman, a front for the Israeli Lobby, called the program “loudly heard and appreciated within the Iranian dissident community.” The past experience of our government should have demonstrated that such interference in the affairs of another nation would create greater hostilities. One of the objectives of the Lobby has been to create greater hostility between Iran and our government. Also, it must be obvious that any Iranian accepting money from our American administration to create trouble for Iran would be considered a traitor, a spy and at least would be shunned by Iranians. Would we react differently if anyone of us would accept money from a foreign country for the purpose of creating unrest within the United States?
In the jargon of the present administration of the United States, any government friendly to Israel and subservient to our American foreign policy and providing us with cheap natural resources is a friend of the United States.
What is “democracy promotion in Iran”? One definition of democracy would be a country managed by a representative government elected under the principle of “one man one vote”. Under this definition, Iran is democratic country; the Iranian president and the representative of government are elected by the Iranian people. During the last elections more of the eligible Iranians voted than in our own elections. Why are we so concern about Iran? We have too many problems at home to deal with, including education, healthcare and deteriorating infrastructures.
MyAmerica the beautiful
The pictures:
The pictures:
An image of crimes of those nations who
supported Saddam Hussein to produce the chemical
and biological weapons used against Iranians and Kurds.
Germany along with other Western countries including Britain, France, Italy, and the United States, provided Iraq with biological andchemical weapons. Are we going to inflict the same kind of crime once more on the people of Iran?
Comments